Yeah totally, women should just ignore when men fuck up their sports, force their way into women's prisons and commit rape there, expose themselves in girls' bathrooms, and get women fired for opposing it. I won't even mention the children being mutilated and sterilized in the name of this fraud.
I mean, let's all pretend like nothing is happening and these ugly fucked up trannies just want to pee!
There is something about the low-class, low-IQ people who are attracted to defending this. You're literally disconnected from reality, and you think your total ignorance somehow makes you morally virtuous. It's disgusting to witness such a lack of intelligence and shame.
OMG SHE PUBLISHED A NEO NAZI, THAT MEANS SHE PROBABLY DID RACISMS TOO ONCE, THAT'S WHY SHE POINTED OUT A MAN WAS ON THE GIRLS' TEAM.
You people are cooked. And I think you know it. Nobody wants to see ugly, fucked up troons ruining women's sports, and you are too stupid to understand what freedom of speech is, so I won't even try to explain that.
You are so far from the point that you need a life preserver. The point is that outing people, with almost no exceptions, is wrong wrong wrong. And God forbid if Slatz was wrong and Fleming isn’t trans. Only someone who would give one of the worst people in the world an unfettered platform would find outing acceptable.
Since you clearly show an inability to understand an argument, or an issue, I will make this more simple for you. A Nazi has free speech rights but NO ONE is obligated to publish their so-called truth. Anyone who owns or manages a newspaper has every right to NOT publish someone's article on the basis of their free speech and press rights. It is a matter of JUDGMENT whether an editor should CHOOSE to publish an article by a Nazi, or to out someone while lacking any evidence of whether that targeted person is trans. Darrell is simply pointing out that the editor exercised very poor judgment in both cases. Are you too obtuse to see that, or are you willfully refusing to see that because you are blinded by your own bigotry? Are you're telling others to learn how to argue? I suggest you invest in a mirror and use it.
She exercised good judgment because she supports freedom of speech.
As a matter of principle, intelligent people understand how freedom of speech and freedom of expression work.
Low IQ dolts and weak people who aren't smart enough to defend their claims engage in shutting people down because they can't defend their stupid beliefs.
That's you. You exercise poor judgment by defending trannies and acting like you have any moral high ground.
You don't. You're unintelligent and immoral, and you aren't even smart enough to understand basic freedoms.
Just stop talking because it's embarrassing to watch stupid people to do this.
The unethical person here is Fleming (and his enablers). He is a liar, a coward, a bully, and a cheat. He unethically claimed to be what he is not: female. And he has disrupted the lives of hundreds of women, women who had every right to demand and to expect fair competition, and did not get it. His lie was called out, which is absolutely an ethical action.
And you are upset that, as a college student, a woman actually stood up for free speech. You apparently do not understand that banning "hate speech" is effectively banning all speech. There are people (I am very close to being one of them) who would call this very post of yours "hate speech". Do you not understand that? Look up the arrests for tweets that are happening in countries like the UK that do not have the equivalent of the First Amendment.
More generally, do you not understand that the TQ movement is anti-gay? They are "transing away the gay". Every year in this country, thousands of gay kids are mutilated and sterilized, because they are told that their incipient same-sex attraction means that they are *akshually* the opposite sex. It's horrific, it's a crime against humanity, and it will go down in history as the greatest medical scandal of all time.
Wow. Tim Walz is right; we really would be better off if people would just mind their own damn business.
Yeah totally, women should just ignore when men fuck up their sports, force their way into women's prisons and commit rape there, expose themselves in girls' bathrooms, and get women fired for opposing it. I won't even mention the children being mutilated and sterilized in the name of this fraud.
I mean, let's all pretend like nothing is happening and these ugly fucked up trannies just want to pee!
There is something about the low-class, low-IQ people who are attracted to defending this. You're literally disconnected from reality, and you think your total ignorance somehow makes you morally virtuous. It's disgusting to witness such a lack of intelligence and shame.
So does that justify outing people?
There is nothing to "out."
"Trans" does not exist.
Mr. Fleming is a man. He does not belong in women's sports.
This is called basic reality.
Women's safety is more important than male perversion and delusion.
Do any of you live in reality? Do any of you know how to argue? Do any of you have any morals?
If you stoop so low as to defend this, that means you have no respect for basic truth and morality.
That explains a lot of this disgusting behavior, including from you.
Be ashamed of yourself.
Do you have any evidence for any of your claims or are you just spewing your bigoted impotence?
Huh?
You people are defending mentally ill men in women's sports who are causing physical injuries to women, and you're talking about evidence?
You care about evidence now?
He's a man. If you need evidence, you should have sex with him.
Troon defenders are the lowest run of humanity.
Well, bless your heart.
Great arguments from troon defenders
OMG SHE PUBLISHED A NEO NAZI, THAT MEANS SHE PROBABLY DID RACISMS TOO ONCE, THAT'S WHY SHE POINTED OUT A MAN WAS ON THE GIRLS' TEAM.
You people are cooked. And I think you know it. Nobody wants to see ugly, fucked up troons ruining women's sports, and you are too stupid to understand what freedom of speech is, so I won't even try to explain that.
Learn how to argue. Or just admit you can't.
You are so far from the point that you need a life preserver. The point is that outing people, with almost no exceptions, is wrong wrong wrong. And God forbid if Slatz was wrong and Fleming isn’t trans. Only someone who would give one of the worst people in the world an unfettered platform would find outing acceptable.
There is no such thing as "outing" when you point out that a man does not belong in women's sports.
Women's safety is more important than men and their idiotic perversions and delusions.
You aren't smart enough to argue this.
Mr. Fleming does not belong in women's sports because no men belong in women's sports.
He's a man. Everyone and anyone must know.
End of story.
Since you clearly show an inability to understand an argument, or an issue, I will make this more simple for you. A Nazi has free speech rights but NO ONE is obligated to publish their so-called truth. Anyone who owns or manages a newspaper has every right to NOT publish someone's article on the basis of their free speech and press rights. It is a matter of JUDGMENT whether an editor should CHOOSE to publish an article by a Nazi, or to out someone while lacking any evidence of whether that targeted person is trans. Darrell is simply pointing out that the editor exercised very poor judgment in both cases. Are you too obtuse to see that, or are you willfully refusing to see that because you are blinded by your own bigotry? Are you're telling others to learn how to argue? I suggest you invest in a mirror and use it.
She didn't exercise poor judgment.
She exercised good judgment because she supports freedom of speech.
As a matter of principle, intelligent people understand how freedom of speech and freedom of expression work.
Low IQ dolts and weak people who aren't smart enough to defend their claims engage in shutting people down because they can't defend their stupid beliefs.
That's you. You exercise poor judgment by defending trannies and acting like you have any moral high ground.
You don't. You're unintelligent and immoral, and you aren't even smart enough to understand basic freedoms.
Just stop talking because it's embarrassing to watch stupid people to do this.
The unethical person here is Fleming (and his enablers). He is a liar, a coward, a bully, and a cheat. He unethically claimed to be what he is not: female. And he has disrupted the lives of hundreds of women, women who had every right to demand and to expect fair competition, and did not get it. His lie was called out, which is absolutely an ethical action.
And you are upset that, as a college student, a woman actually stood up for free speech. You apparently do not understand that banning "hate speech" is effectively banning all speech. There are people (I am very close to being one of them) who would call this very post of yours "hate speech". Do you not understand that? Look up the arrests for tweets that are happening in countries like the UK that do not have the equivalent of the First Amendment.
More generally, do you not understand that the TQ movement is anti-gay? They are "transing away the gay". Every year in this country, thousands of gay kids are mutilated and sterilized, because they are told that their incipient same-sex attraction means that they are *akshually* the opposite sex. It's horrific, it's a crime against humanity, and it will go down in history as the greatest medical scandal of all time.